This podcast examines the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) through the lens of excerpts from an April 2023 AB Magazine article, "Heed SVB's Risk Lessons," by Peter Hughes, Founder and former Chair of the Risk Accounting Standards Board. It analyzes the key factors that led to the bank's failure and highlights the urgent need for a more robust risk accounting system.
Key Themes & Facts:
Speed and Severity of the Collapse: SVB went from seeking emergency liquidity to complete failure within just two days following a forced sale of US Treasury bonds and a subsequent bank run by panicked depositors. This highlights the rapid and devastating consequences of inadequate risk management.
"A bank that had generally been considered financially sound just days before was..."
Risk Concentration: SVB's portfolio was heavily concentrated in long-dated US Treasury securities, leaving it vulnerable to interest rate fluctuations. This concentration, coupled with a liability structure largely comprised of tech start-up deposits, amplified the bank's exposure.
"A bank that is overly concentrated in any type of asset or liability is invariably vulnerable to unexpected movements in market rates and prices."
Limitations of Current Risk Disclosure: Existing financial reporting practices rely heavily on risk disclosure without adequately accounting for the potential financial impact. This creates a gap between acknowledged risks and their tangible consequences.
"Backward-looking financial statements that require only the disclosure of accepted risks without accounting for them are obviously of little use or relevance."
Need for Comprehensive Risk Accounting: The article advocates for "risk accounting," a system that quantifies non-financial risks using a metric called "risk units" (RUs). This methodology aims to move beyond subjective risk assessments and enable more accurate measurement and management of potential losses.
"Accounting standards for accepted non-financial risks must be established."
Benefits of Risk Accounting: Implementing risk accounting can:
Enhance transparency and comparability of risk exposures.
Improve risk-adjusted profitability and shareholder equity calculations.
Facilitate the tokenization of residual RUs, potentially enabling banks to collateralize accepted risks and incentivize robust risk management.
Key Takeaways:
The SVB crisis underscores the inadequacy of traditional risk management practices. A paradigm shift towards a more quantifiable and comprehensive risk accounting system is crucial to ensuring financial stability and restoring confidence in the global banking system. The proposed "risk accounting" framework presents a potential solution by enabling the explicit measurement and management of non-financial risks, thereby promoting greater transparency, accountability, and resilience within the financial sector.
Share this post